The Los Angeles Times, usually a front for unions, big government and special interests (and losing circulation by several per cent each quarter) finally told the truth about the quality of teachers in LAUSD.
Worse, they named names--the good teachers are noted, with facts and the bad teachers are noted, with facts.
Unions don't like this, so they are protesting.
Sadly, the parents, who have children in bad schools, are not protesting the union.
This issue shows why government education, owned by unions, needs to end.
Do we want public education or education of the public? Unions provide neither, just force good people to pay bribes if they want to work.
More...
Worse, they named names--the good teachers are noted, with facts and the bad teachers are noted, with facts.
Unions don't like this, so they are protesting.
Sadly, the parents, who have children in bad schools, are not protesting the union.
This issue shows why government education, owned by unions, needs to end.
Do we want public education or education of the public? Unions provide neither, just force good people to pay bribes if they want to work.
More...