Tweet
A 45 year old man gives a 13 year old girl drugs and alcohol, has sex with her. He goes to court, pleads guilty. He is about to be sentenced, but flees the county. For 31 years he laughed about raping a 13 year old. Now he is caught.
The LA Times thinks that because he spent the last 31 years in France, he should not go to jail.
The Times opposed Three Strikes. It opposed the death penalty, it supports illegal aliens. The LA Times demands that criminals be comfortable, have better health care than you and that 40,000 criminals should be released.
So, their support of an ADMITTED rapist is no surprise. "But at a time when California is shredding the safety net that protects the poor and the unemployed, not to mention the budget of the public school system, you'd hope that L.A. County prosecutors had better things to do than cause an international furor by hounding a film director for a 32-year-old sex crime, especially one that Polanski's victim wants to put behind her."
Guess rape is no big deal to the Times if committed by a famous film maker.
Not once in the article did the Times mention that Polanski admitted he raped the girl. This article is as disgraceful as one ever printed in the media. It lies by omission, supports rapes and pretends that a famous person committing rape is a good citizen.
More...
The LA Times thinks that because he spent the last 31 years in France, he should not go to jail.
The Times opposed Three Strikes. It opposed the death penalty, it supports illegal aliens. The LA Times demands that criminals be comfortable, have better health care than you and that 40,000 criminals should be released.
So, their support of an ADMITTED rapist is no surprise. "But at a time when California is shredding the safety net that protects the poor and the unemployed, not to mention the budget of the public school system, you'd hope that L.A. County prosecutors had better things to do than cause an international furor by hounding a film director for a 32-year-old sex crime, especially one that Polanski's victim wants to put behind her."
Guess rape is no big deal to the Times if committed by a famous film maker.
Not once in the article did the Times mention that Polanski admitted he raped the girl. This article is as disgraceful as one ever printed in the media. It lies by omission, supports rapes and pretends that a famous person committing rape is a good citizen.
More...