MJB/Bixby Construction Co

[AyatollahGondola]

Zack and Ayatollah,

Please read the forum rules. One specifically prohibits using the forum to engage in a private war with another registrant.

Ayatollah,

This download was originally posted in the Report fraud and corruption forum, but that is designated for public officials, politicians, and related. It was moved into general discussion for lack of a better forum. This thread and the attached file are going to be reviewed by other moderators and/or the administrators for its' value to Fight Back in Sac. Unless there is some substantial link to public government here, it may be removed.

I can show a link. Fightbackinsac's introduction:

Fight Back in Sac was created as a meeting place for those who seek empowerment, information, and allies to aid in the battle against corruption, malfeasance, and fraud that occurs in our government.

This injunction is a small part of a larger case that was brought by a couple who obviously did not get help from city, county, and state authorities. They sued on their own, and upon winning, or settling if you prefer Zack, they thought about the rest of us rather than just themselves. Read the settlement and you'll see that it was brought in the interests and for the protection of the general public. Many of us have been there too. You can't get the authorities to act, so nothing gets done about it. These folks did it themselves. There's a lesson in there for all of us here. An example if you will...They did the work that a DA or an AG should have done.

[big_cheez]

Zak

Sorry, nice try.
I don't know the case personaly but here's my take on it.

Bixby's attorney told him to take the stipulation, Why? Because if Bixby lost the case, which apprently there was a good chance he was going to loose otherwise he would have fought it, then Bixby would be liable for the defendants attorney fees, court costs, damages, etc, maybe even criminal procedings. This way his wrongdoing slips into oblivion.

I don't know Davi's situation but I do know Bixby. He is vindictive. If he thinks you crossed him or if he can get away with it, he will spend thousands to hound you. Thats just the way he is.

How do I know Bixby, you guessed it, I used to work for him. He's come after me too.
I have been in construction 30 years. I have been a superintendent since early 90s. In all my years, I have never worked for anyone like Bixby. Not one project I worked on was the client happy. My first project for him was heading for litigation before I even started with the company.

To everyone else reading this ... do yourself a favor, before contracting with Bixby, ask for a list of 10 happy clients you can contact as references. If he does come up with 10, check them very carefully.

[True Blue]

Mark Bixby/ MJB Construction is still a crook

No matter what Zack says, this guy is an itimidating, liar and a crook.
He will take advantage of you at ANY cost.

He prays on the elderly and the weak.
He has the court system down to a science.
The reason there was no trial is because he would have had to admit guilt. This was his way of avoiding that.

If you would like to KNOW if he is lying, just look at his lips. If they are moving, he is lying.

Stay clear of this dude!
( Unless of course you have a ton of money to lose and throw away)

True Blue

[Referee]

Zack and Ayatollah,

Please read the forum rules. One specifically prohibits using the forum to engage in a private war with another registrant.

Ayatollah,

This download was originally posted in the Report fraud and corruption forum, but that is designated for public officials, politicians, and related. It was moved into general discussion for lack of a better forum. This thread and the attached file are going to be reviewed by other moderators and/or the administrators for its' value to Fight Back in Sac. Unless there is some substantial link to public government here, it may be removed.

[Zack]

The injunction was agreed to without a trial, without taking any evidence, and without any admission of liability or wrongdoing to settle the litigation. It is not evidence of any misconduct and shall not be treated as an admission of liability by any party for any purpose.
On the other hand, "AyatollahGondola" is Davi Rodrigues who sued Mr. Bixby and lost. Mr. Bixby sued Mr. Rodrigues and has a judgment against him in excess of $105,000, for breach of lease. Mr. Rodrigues’ motivation is obvious.

[AyatollahGondola]

This company has a permanent injunction and permanent restraining order you may download from this post